Soon after Redmi Airdots came out, I decided to write a comparison between Redmi Airdots and QCY T1S.
1. Comparison of outer packaging
The outer package of QCY T1S is mainly white, with a wooden carton inside. Redmi AirDots packaging is relatively simple, there is only a white paper classification board.
2. Accessories comparison
The accessories of QCY T1S include charging box plus main body, two pairs of earplugs of different sizes, charging wires and instructions.
Redmi AirDots accessories have charging box plus main body, two pairs of earplugs of different sizes, instructions, no charging wire.
The accessories of both true wireless headphones are about the same fineness, Redmi AirDots may be for further cost savings not only for easy packaging, but also for charging wires.
3. Appearance contrast
In appearance, I think the Redmi AirDots is superior to the QCY T1S. The Redmi AirDots is smaller and easier to carry.
Of course, there are great benefits to being big. QCY can be easily taken out when you pick up and put your headphones, but Redmi AirDots is not so easy to take out, especially if your hands are sweaty.
When opening the cover, the sound of QCY T1S is louder than that of Redmi AirDots.
4. Weight and battery capacity
QCY T1S: single headset weighs 4.6g, charging bin capacity is 800mAh, headset battery capacity 43mAh (single headset).
The Reami AirDots: weighs 4.0g (the same weight as Apple's AirPods), the charging compartment has a capacity of 300mAh, and the headphone battery capacity is 40mAh (single headset).
5. Charging time and battery life
The QCY T1S charging time is about 2 hours and the headphone life time is 6 hours.
The Redmi AirDots charging time is about 2 hours and the headphone life time is 6 hours.
Because of the small difference in the battery capacity of the headphones, the two did not distance themselves from each other on the battery life.
6. Sound quality
The sound quality of the two is roughly the same, and the personal hearing thinks QCY T1S is a little better.
QCY T1S is a little better than, Redmi AirDots in resolution. The performance of both treble is very poor, the alto is OK, these two headphones are more suitable for listening to baritone songs, bass QCY T1S is also a little better, percussion instruments sound more crisp, and Redmi Airdots appears to be very stuffy.
There is a high delay in both games, and games such as FPS are delayed around 100ms, and it is highly recommended that you use Bluetooth headphones to play games such as FPS. Playing Honor of Kings will be good, but you can also recognize the delay.
The reception distance of the two headphones is better than Redmi AirDots. Wear Redmi AirDots to the toilet, put your phone in the bedroom, the bedroom is 4 meters away from the toilet in a straight line, there are two walls (neither of them are load-bearing walls), and there is no stutter when playing songs. And QCY T1S will appear on the sound of Catton.
In addition, a few more words here, before the release of Redmi AirDots, many netizens said that Redmi AirDots is done by the QCY factory, the primary school brother compared the production address of the two headphones and concluded that, Redmi AirDots is not a contract manufacturer in the QCY factory.
Bluetooth headphones mainly talk about appearance, comfort, and battery life, so I didn't focus on sound quality this time. The sound quality of $100 Bluetooth headphones is really impossible to talk about.
The Redmi AirDots looks better than the QCY T1s and the, Redmi AirDots is more round than the QCY T1S, at least that's what I think.
Wearing Redmi AirDots was also better than QCY T1S, and there was no ear pain after listening to the song all morning. In addition, there was no disconnection in Redmi AirDots, and there were more disconnection in QCY T1S. In addition, Redmi AirDots has a little ear noise when it doesn't play audio.
There is no significant difference in battery life between the two, and the headphone charging bin QCY T1S is much larger. After all, T1S is an upgrade of T1, mainly to upgrade the charging bin capacity.