ByJoe Horner 2019-06-22 5402
| Samsung Galaxy Fit | Samsung Galaxy Fit-e | |
Appearance | Screen size | 0.95 inch | 0.74 inch |
Screen type | AMOLED | PMOLED | |
Screen resolution | 120x240 282ppi | 64x128 193ppi | |
Color | 2 color wristbands | 3 color wristbands | |
Functions | Weight | 23g | 15g |
waterproofing grade | 5ATM | 5ATM | |
Battery | 120mAh | 70mAh | |
Standby time | 7 days | 7 days | |
GPS | support | support | |
Bluetotth | Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 | |
OS | FreeRTOS | FreeRTOS | |
Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyro, HRM | Accelerometer,HRM | |
Chip | MCU Cortex M33F 96MHz | MCU Cortex M0 96Hz | |
Price | $99.99 | $35 |
From this comparison table, we can see the difference between Galaxy Fit and Galaxy Fit-e clearly. The Galaxy Fit-e aimed at low-end market, the Fit focus on the mid-to-high end.
AS a fitness tracker, both of them equipped the functions what a smart band must have. Such as sport or sleep data monitoring, kinds of sport mode, message notifications and so on.
If you are a smart wear beginner, the Samsung Galaxy Fit-e is a good choice, the price also acceptable. But if you have a higher demand about smart band, the Xiaomi’s new product Mi band 4 is a better choice than Samsung Galaxy Fit, for detail, you can reference this post, then, you can get why Mi band 4 is better than Galaxy Fit.
Extensive Product Selection● Over 300,000 products ● 20 different categories ● 15 local warehosues ● Multiple top brands | Convenient Payment● Global payment options: Visa, MasterCard, American Express ● PayPal, Western Union and bank transfer are accepted ● Boleto Bancario via Ebanx (for Brazil) | ||
Prompt Shipping● Unregistered air mail ● Registered air mail ● Priority line ● Expedited shipping | Dedicated After-sales Service● 45 day money back guarantee ● 365 day free repair warranty ● 7 day Dead on Arrival guarantee (DOA) |
Huawei P40 and P40 Pro are on the way
2019-05-25
Huami Amazfit Bip 2 VS Xiaomi Mi band 4
2019-06-12